google image |
Note by School of Vice
The facts or features contained
in this article are reproduced in entirety from other sources which are clearly
stated, and not the work or imagination of School of Vice.
However, if I feel the
necessity to "brush up my history lessons" I would be most ill
advised to do so on instruction from faux pas ‘scholars’ and ‘historians’ of
Vietnam who have no shame in concocting historical "facts" to fit in
with the official Party line?
Now, assuming this particular
story report is false and your version is historically accurate, what then are
your versions of history or "lessons" surrounding the Mekong Delta
[Kampuchea Krom], Koh Tral [Sorry, it’s "Phu Qoc" in your language! A
place visible from Kep on most days, unlike all these distant South China Sea
islands you claim as yours. Of course, territorial sovereignty is not governed
by distance necessarily] the Kingdom of Champa, the on-going encroachments
along Cambodia's eastern border and so forth?
I believe that even yourself
and most of your Vietnamese compatriots know that their nation has historically
been in large measure a product of piece meal annexations of other peoples' and
nations' domains and historical territories: a nation carved up of other
nations' expanses and sovereignties. So, aren't you being a shade disingenuous
asking your own nation's victims [or indeed anyone for that matter!] to take
historical lessons when you yourself along with your genetically like minded
compatriots never care about the losses endured by other peoples as a result of
your own [nation's] greed and actions, nor the academic principle of veracity
or integrity and scrupulous empirical truths before history? And consider, if
you will, how absurd it would be for the Jews to take history lessons from the
Nazis about racism and holocaust? I rest my case...for now!
.................
Anonymous said...
“The island belongs to Vietnam,
it is not debatable. However, Here is what one of the local filipinos island
mayor said...
“Through proper coordination
via diplomatic channels, perhaps we can go there and shop for our basic needs
instead of sourcing our supplies from mainland Palawan, which is quite far,”
Bito-onon said...
As you could see, Vietnam's
supermarket will benefit everyone.”
.................
Additional note by School of
Vice
Let's see what the Chinese have
to say about your ‘not debatable’ ownership issue!
Sourcing supplies and
establishing supermarkets are one thing, but using these means to entrench your
roots and occupation of someone else's territories as you [Vietnam] have been
doing to your neighbours’ rightful properties, is another matter altogether.
Further, isn't that the same
slogan and bait you and your ancestors had deployed vis a vis the Chams, the
Khmers and the Montagnards [ethnic hill tribes] in history i.e. that your
settlements in a given local region would work out to the universal benefit of
all? For instance, presently, that floating settlements by Vietnamese
immigrants on the lake of the Tonle Sap help bring down and keep the price of
fish consumption low? Indeed, you have been applying the same economic logic to
all your long term strategic schemes in Indochina from Triangle Economic
Development to mass prostitution and media broadcasting, particularly, in
regions marked by clear ethnic populations and along the bordering provinces!
Surely, is that not also the very same logic in gifting prostitutes to a
commanding officer on his birthday whilst you prepared and moved your troops
onto an unprotected deserted island?
If you are absolutely sure that
your ownership of the island in question is beyond debate, would it not have
been more honourable and proper to settle conflicting claims through diplomatic
or legal channels? I understand that you have called for the South China Sea
territorial disputes with China to be settled at the World Court or
multilaterally through Asean mechanism. This being a superpower you cannot hope
to confront militarily to enforce your claims? On the other hand, you have been
doing everything possible to ensure your satellite regime in Phnom Penh will
never have recourse to ask the World Court or the UN Security Council to
protect Cambodia's national sovereignty and territory from your perennial
encroachments!
When will you and your kind
ever learn to live among your neighbours without deceptions and treachery for a
change, eh? What makes you assume all these ethnic groups would rather live
under your imposed rule and submit to your discriminatory laws and
disenfranchisement against them in the immediate or long term?
No comments:
Post a Comment