Indonesia’s Anti-Corruption Fight
Anti-corruption could be Jokowi’s ticket to political redemption.
By Nithin Coca
February 08, 2016 TD
![]() |
Image Credit: REUTERS/Beawiharta |
Corruption
has once again taken center stage in Indonesia, following the
resignation in December of House Speaker Setya Novanto for being caught
attempting to extort Indonesia’s largest taxpayer, U.S. mining giant
Freeport McMoRan’s subsidiary PT Freeport Indonesia, and mounting
evidence that the devastating fires that negatively impacted the country
late last year, to the tune of $30 billion, were fueled by local
corruption. Political infighting has meant that Indonesia’s
long-simmering, critically important fight against corruption has been
in limbo for nearly a year, and soon President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo will
face a decision whether or not to make fighting corruption the
centerpoint of his administration, or its downfall.
To
the surprise of many, Indonesia actually improved in the recently
released Corruption Perception Index, moving up from 107th last year to
88th this year, which the organization credited to improvements in the
country’s bureaucracy and public services – initiatives pushed forward
by Jokowi – but also partly to increasing corruption in other countries.
However, the report noted that Indonesia could take a huge step forward
if it empowered its once famous, internationally renowned
anti-corruption agency.
That
would be Indonesia’s most trusted public institution, the Corruption
Eradication Commission (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, KPK). The KPK has
made a reputation for itself globally for thoroughly investigating,
researching, and trying high-level targets, and, in its first 13 years,
achieving an astounding 100% conviction rate.
“The
KPK was clearly seen as one of the strongest anti-corruption
institutions in the world, showing recognition that this is a serious
problem worth tackling,” said Samantha Grant, regional coordinator for
Southeast Asia at Transparency International.
The
KPK was by no means perfect, and its limited scope – national level
cases – meant the vast majority of Indonesia’s corruption, which takes
place at the regional and local levels, was going un-prosecuted.
Nevertheless, the KPK made numerous enemies, and early last year, the
fight reached a boiling point when two KPK commissioners were arrested
by the National Police on trumped up charges that were clearly meant to
permanently weaken the institution.
Now,
finally, after months of delay, the House – yes, the same one which
just had its speaker resign due to corruption – picked five new
commissioners. Just days later, they were sworn in by Jokowi, who
announced a need to “get the KPK functioning again.” None of the new
commissioners have previous experience with the KPK, with one, Alexander
Marwata, having often sided with graft defendants in his previous role
as a judge. Three others were derided by NGOs as being weak, and only
one commissioner, Laode Muhammad Syarif, known for his green leanings,
was accepted as having the qualifications and stature to be part of the
KPK. Not surprisingly, much of Indonesian civil society was
disappointed.
“I
am worried that the KPK is no longer a commission to eradicate
corruption, but a commission to support corruption,” Indonesian
Corruption Watch’s Emerson Yuntho said in a statement.
“The
new appointments certainly don’t strengthen the KPK – they are the
latest in the House of Representatives’ ongoing attempts to defang the
commission,” said Gregory B. Poling, an Indonesia expert at the Center
for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
The
KPK is a peculiar entity in many ways. Though its members are appointed
by the House and approved by the president, it is an independent
institution that is accountable primarily to the public. It has, time
and time again, stood up against political pressure, and in the
Indonesian public it has a powerful ally. A unique factor in democratic
Indonesia is the willingness of regular citizens to stand up for the
KPK, having taken to the streets numerous times in its history as it has
faced repeated attempts to have its power cut. If the new commissioners
attempt to work from within to stunt the KPK, expect a reaction.
“The
public has come to the KPK’s back more than once in the past,” said
Poling. “I don’t think the man on the street will sit back and let this
happen – they will become engaged.”
Part
of this is that many Indonesians regularly brush up against corruption
in some form or another. “The public supports the fight against
corruption as they understand how much corruption is hurting them,” said
Natalia Soebagjo, executive director at the Center for the Study of
Governance at University of Indonesia. “Corruption cases are spoken
about openly in the media, and in social media, corruption issues often
go viral.”
What
the public really wants, however, is the president they elected, the
clean, get-it-done mayor of Solo and Jakarta, to become the
anti-corruption leader they thought they were voting for. Jokowi will
get a chance soon to decide where he stands on the issue. The Indonesian
House of Representatives, fresh off its nominations, is now pushing to
weaken the KPK’s law enforcement capability. Currently the KPK can
arrest, hold, and try members independently of the national police, an
institution that is not only widely corrupt, but has repeatedly fought
against the KPK and is the source of the institution’s current weakness.
Public Opinion
“Public
opinion is in favor of the KPK and against the House’s plan. Jokowi
should help them to voice their will,” said Burhanuddin Muhtadi, a
political researcher who runs Indonesia Political Indicator.
In
fact, Jokowi may have some political capital to work with too. Despite
the disappointment of the past year-plus since he was inaugurated,
Jokowi remains personally popular in Indonesia, and recent public
opinion polls show him returning to his previous position as one of the
country’s most popular politicians, alongside his former deputy, Jakarta
Governor Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja Purnama, and Bandung Governor Ridwan
Kamil. All three are new-wave politicians with no ties to Indonesia’s
political oligarchy, with reputations as clean, anti-graft leaders.
In
fact, corruption is partly why many don’t blame Jokowi for the lack of
change in government, recognizing that he barely controls the corrupt
House, and is still under the thumb of his party’s despised leader,
Megawati Sukarnoputri. Pushing forward on the corruption fight and
standing behind the KPK would allow the president to both appeal to the
public, while also weakening the position of those in Jakarta, including
in his own political party, who oppose the KPK.
“Jokowi
wanted to avoid conflict, and thus deferred to his political patrons,
which had resulted in a very inept response,” said Poling, speaking of
the year-long incapacitation of the KPK.
Adding
to the fire, quite literally, are the recent fires that burned more
than 2 million hectares of land in Sumatra and Borneo, emitting haze
that impacted the health of an estimated 44 million people. Corruption
was a key driver in not only the illegal burning of land, but years of
lax enforcement of deforestation and the handing out of land to cronies.
A KPK report released in October found that illegal deforestation sales
between 2003-2014 were an astounding $81 billion, resulting in up to
$8.9 billion in lost state revenue.
Both
ASEAN and global government are strongly pushing Indonesia to take
action to stop the fires and the resulting haze. If Jokowi is to put an
end to the recurring fires, then a strong anti-corruption push is
crucial, through a cleaning out of the forestry and land sectors by the
KPK, or a similar institution. There is hope that Laode – the one
positive appointee – can lead this fight.
Another
hopeful sign – the tapping of highly respected former KPK spokesperson
Johan Budi to serve as the new presidential spokesperson.
Anti-corruption supporters will be hoping that his appointment signals
that the government is about to take corruption seriously. Jokowi – and
Indonesia’s – future both depend on it.
Nithin
Coca is a freelance writer and journalist who focuses on cultural,
economic, and environmental issues in developing countries. Follow him
on Twitter @excinit.
No comments:
Post a Comment