by
School of Vice
Ref. Caught between two Kingdoms [Why Khmers celebrate Chinese New
Year?] the Phnom Penh Post
The Khmers are probably more racially mixed through
interbreeding with other racial groups than they are aware or be willing to
acknowledge, and in terms of Sino-Khmer ethnic fusion or integration, they are
on a par with most neighbouring countries like Laos and Thailand. So to suggest
that 'The Khmer-Chen, Cambodians with
Chinese blood, make up fewer than nine per cent of the population' is at
best misleading. Virtually, all Khmers are racially mixed through gradual
contacts with foreign migrants, particularly, Chinese people from Chinese
provinces bordering the Khmer Empire down the centuries.
There are reasons why
the Empire offered itself as such a promising destination to these migrants,
and this has something to do with the all-round bountiful conditions of its
environs, including demographic density and its corresponding demands on
economic and natural resources like land use and food source. All of these
factors stood in sharp contrast to those found in the ‘Middle Kingdom’ where
constant struggle and competition for survival would have been far more intense
and where natural disasters often led to famines and deaths for millions even
without the added catastrophe and pressure of intermittent warfare between
warring states prior to the Chinese communist revolution of 1949.
Apart from traditional Chinese quarters that can be found in
urban commercial districts of most of Cambodia's major cities where ethnic
Chinese or Sino-Khmers are most visible, racial integration through marriage
among Khmers and Chinese descents has carried on in an almost imperceptible
fashion throughout the rest of the rural parts of the country. Yet the gradual
manner in which this integration has been affected historically and the
melting-pot, cultural capacities of the host culture to absorb and induct
new-comers into its fold and customs, making them part of their own distinct
ethnic fabric has meant that any alien entities would have sooner become
seamlessly submerged or infused well within the host culture's dominant ‘pot’ without
diluting or doing violence to either respective set of the merging cultures – a
co-habiting process known in anthropology and ethnography as 'acculturation'.
That the same process
has proceeded up to today without experiencing - in relative terms – any
notable racial-ethnic tension and disharmony is thanks in no small part to the
peaceful, tolerant framework of the host culture, and in particular, the
all-embracing outlook provided by Theravada Buddhism as this great influence
had been adopted by the Khmers and adapted to their own existing indigenous
cultural stock or pot.
Another factor worth noting is that the earliest waves of
Chinese immigrants consisted mostly of men, and this is known to us partly through
historical Chinese records gathered by Chinese envoys like Zhou Da Guan who travelled
[and probably spied] the Kingdom during the late Angkorean period. Some of these men were former military conscripts; others were
traders and drifters looking for adventure or on the run from the law back
home; all of whom were lured into settling down in their adopted country by the
temperate climate, the abundance of foods and the richness of the land in
general, but just as importantly, for these men, the native women were exotic
and easily wooed. Zhou’s observation
on Khmer women’s apparently insatiable sexual appetite and their readiness to ditch
their partners for new lovers when their carnal desire not adequately met may
reflect more the prejudices and pre-conceived fantasies of the observer and of
his fellow countrymen rather than anything with objective basis in reality. Nor
was he the first and the last to have projected his own fantasies onto the
people he was observing. European field researchers and anthropologists have
been known to have produced libraries of archives about strange [“exotic”] and
far-fetched romantic indigenous cultures whilst fathering, and eventually
leaving to the care of the natives they studied, many an illegitimate child!
There
was, in addition, the psychological-sexual temptation or allure of a
cross-racial marriage, specifically, between people of contrast skin colour or
complexion. The ‘savages’ of various tribes of Africa, Latin America or the
natives of the Pacific colonies and islands; a people the Chinese would have
described as “barbarians” may not be held in high estimation in cultural or
intellectual terms by the ‘civilised’ participating observer, yet they were
irresistible objects of temptation and fascination to be raped and lusted after
all the same. Hence, most of these
Chinese men never returned to their places of birth. And hence many Cambodians
today carry Chinese surnames as Khmer people customarily pass down the paternal
family name through their offspring.
My reason for dwelling on this is to highlight the rather
complicated issue of 'race' which has often been too conventionally and
expediently exploited as a tool for advancing political motives. Indeed, in
Cambodia's own recent past this exploitation had been engineered feverishly and
to the detriment of all Khmers whether they considered themselves as "pure
Khmer" [think of Saloth Sar's - Pol Pot - chosen pen
name: 'Original Khmer'] or Sino-Khmer
[Khmer-Chen] or even ‘Khmer-Vietnamese’ as this latter reference is becoming
more and more pertinent in today's actual context even if people’s social
attitude can be said to evolve at a much slower pace than do physical or
biological phenomena.
Under Pol Pot's rule, the 'race card' proved to be such a
destructive double-edged weapon that it went well beyond any genuine
'patriotic' or nationalistic desire to preserve perceived notions of
"racial purity" or national self-preservation as such, that this
misguided xenophobic sentiment left itself wide open to and for intractable
enemies of the Khmer nation to turn that same weapon against its own kind; to
eliminate the ethnic Chinese who ‘polluted the Khmer race’; to wipe out the
hated Vietnamese through their constructed representations in the forms of
those identified as "having Khmer
bodies with Vietnamese heads", which is precisely what had been
achieved - it must be added - to almost the last Cambodian or Khmer! What a perverse
yet devastatingly effective device that is: borrow the hands of a people to
butcher off their own kind willingly and ferociously without so much of the
sentiment of pity or the benefit of a troubled conscience on the part of the
ones doing the borrowing!
Sadly, there are still Cambodians who continue to harbour
under this self-destructive ideology which they have unwittingly imbibed
through twisted propaganda and indoctrination. What really defines a person or
a ‘race’ is their actual emotion and attachment to a culture, a place or
community which we all experience as humans. In short, it has everything to do
with their social consciousness or self-perception which does not necessarily
obey any biological laws or the limitations of any given artificially constructed
concept like ‘race’ or ideology that throughout human history had been seized
upon by political movements, national governments as well as states in the
promotion of their own - often narrow - ends with untold bloody consequences.
The need and struggle for national self-determination and
emancipation from foreign oppression or yoke, on the other hand, can be viewed
as a function of unjust, inequitable relations between national states, or more
precisely, a demonstration of deliberate violation of one nation’s sovereignty
by another through state-led agendas and practices. This is a fault or
defective characteristic, not so much of a people or even less a race, but
rather a reflection of ambition of organised associations and groups in terms
of their desire and greed that drive that ambition on relentlessly and at cruel
expense of those – in this case, a smaller nation with recognised incompetent
leadership - less well equipped to withstand their rape and onslaught.
Of course, it's not going to win me many awards writing
about this emotive subject. But, still . . .
Happy Chinese New Year!
- School of Vice
No comments:
Post a Comment