Chinese people need to reflect on why their words and actions are so frightening to other countries.
Yang Hengjun
By Yang Hengjun
May 23, 2014
The anti-China riots in Vietnam left at least one Chinese dead and
hundreds injured. Local Chinese have been afraid to speak Chinese in
Vietnam.
Countries with the same system and ideology are not definitely going to
be China’s friends. Russia in the north and Vietnam in the south were
once “comrades and brothers,” but they have also been historically
unfriendly towards China, which is something to keep in mind…
In fact, it is almost impossible for China to be a hegemon in the
international arena. China’s values and philosophy are not convincing to
or admired by others, and China has few real allies. Plus, China is
beset by a lot of domestic problems. Forget hegemony—though it seems
powerful, China is much weaker than it seems, like a giant with feet of
clay. However, the impression we have given to the international
community is that China is a “tyrant,” and many neighboring countries
are beginning to fear and hate China. Over the years, in my travels in
China and abroad, I’ve experienced this deeply.
The United States claims it is “rebalancing to Asia,” but it’s been slow
to act on this. Why? Because it doesn’t have to—America is waiting for
its opportunity! It is waiting for China to mess things up for itself.
When China’s relations with neighboring countries have deteriorated one
by one, when the Asian countries are beginning to “fear” China, then
even if America didn’t want to “rebalance to Asia” the other countries
would ask it to return. We should think about this: In a few short
years, many Asian countries have come to believe that China is more
“hegemonistic” and more frightening than the U.S. We can really escape
all responsibility for this?
The injustice is, China hasn’t done anything wrong! And our leaders
endlessly “justify” China’s action. But there’s one area where we are
guilty. Look at public opinion in China: from netizens to the Foreign
Ministry, everyone’s busy talking about defending the Diaoyu Islands,
teaching the Philippines a lesson, putting little Vietnam in its place,
or joining with Russia to fight the United States. When it comes to
diplomacy and China’s relations with her neighbors, everyone is amped
up. But after years of talking, what do we have to show for it? Outside
of smashing some Japanese cars (which were made in China, and driven by
Chinese people on Chinese soil), not only have we not recovered a single
inch of territory, but we’ve made the U.S. and Japan move closer to
each other. Japan is arming itself, a few poor souls have been caught by
the Philippines and threatened with a prison sentence, and now, violent
groups in Vietnam are openly killing Chinese people! How is that right?
The last time I went to a TV station to film an international program, I
asked a friend why they always dragged out Mr. So-and-so to talk about
China’s foreign relations. Not only does he not understand the
situation, I said, but he’s full of hatred and violence, totally against
the spirit of China’s diplomacy and foreign policy. If I were a
foreigner and watched his program, I would think that China is a fascist
country, not just a simple hegemon. My friend at the station told me
this guy’s show gets high rating. The viewers love it! Moreover, he
said, I’ve noticed that if people lean left rather than right on foreign
affairs, then even if you’re wrong the authorities won’t be offended.
Whereas if we have you on the show, Mr. Yang, what you talk about will
be “sensitive”—even if the Foreign Ministry announces the same policy
tomorrow.
So let’s imagine for a bit: what if America (which is more powerful than
China) had a TV show sponsored by the government where the speakers
constantly talked about “sending troops” and “teaching China a lesson.”
What would happen? The professor who taught me international relations
once said that international relations are like the relationships
between people. If you do not understand something, put yourself in the
other person’s shoes and think about it. Then you’ll understand.
Some of us just do not understand. According to their thinking, once
China becomes strong we can recover the disputed territory by force, and
wipe clean our “shame.” But in fact, the territorial disputes didn’t
start yesterday, although they have really flared up in the past few
years. There are many complex historical reasons for the disputes. Of
course, in our opinion, the problem is that the United States doesn’t
want China to be strong, so it gets China’s smaller neighbors to stir up
trouble to contain China’s rise. But to people in many other countries,
it’s the exact opposite: China is strong and is preparing to change the
status quo by force—China is going to bully those smaller, weaker
countries.
Of course, this isn’t true. But there’s one thing we can’t deny: many of
the government-controlled media outlets have clearly revealed that kind
of thinking. It seems right to us: if we cannot recover China’s
territory, then why do we have an army? Why did China become strong? But
people in other countries will naturally be worried, and they will
prepare to join together and even urge America to “rebalance to Asia.”
We have a clear “Cold War mentality”: When a small country fights with
us or causes trouble, then it is secretly supported by the United
States. It’s as if China is the only country on earth that is really
independent, unafraid to stand up even to stronger countries. No, we
assume that other countries have to find a patron before they can fight
with us. How big of a “tyrant” do you have to be to force small
countries to cling to the U.S. for support before daring to argue with
you? In fact, in modern international relations it’s difficult to use
big guns as your only source of support. “A just cause enjoys abundant
support while an unjust cause finds little support”— this is the slogan
we proposed and we should remember it. China has never been afraid of
being bullied by strong countries and in fact has been bullied by other
countries in the past. But our smaller neighbors are the same way.
Let’s return to the question: The violence in Vietnam was horrifying,
and we cannot help but think of the sad history of anti-China sentiment
in Vietnam. We cannot let the thugs escape the law, and Vietnam must
provide compensation for all the economic losses. Vietnam must also
accept responsibility for the casualties. Vietnam must punish the
rioters and promise to China that no similar incidents will occur in the
future.
However, as a rising power, we should also take some time to reflect.
President Xi said, “There’s no gene for invasion in the Chinese people’s
blood.” China does not seek hegemony; this has been emphasized many
times. But our official media as well as social media do appear to have
the “gene” for verbal abuse, if not hegemony. The media should align
itself with the speech of President Xi, instead of adding fuel to the
fire on international issues just for the sake higher ratings and more
clicks. In addition, when stressing the relations between big powers
(like Europe, Russia, and the United States), we should not forget the
most important thing: improving our relations with neighboring
countries. As President Xi said, “A far-off relative is not as good as a
close neighbor.” China should make greater efforts to keep good
relations with its neighbors, putting aside prejudice and historical
baggage, in order to gradually adapt to its role as a big country.
This piece originally appeared in Chinese on Yang Hengjun’s blog. The original post can be found here.
Yang Hengjun is a Chinese independent
scholar, novelist, and blogger. He once worked in the Chinese Foreign
Ministry and as a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council in Washington,
DC. Yang received his Ph.D. from the University of Technology, Sydney in
Australia. His Chinese language blog is featured on major Chinese
current affairs and international relations portals and his pieces
receive millions of hits. Yang’s blog can be accessed at
www.yanghengjun.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment