Rhona Smith, please don’t repeat Subedi’s mistakes
Cambodia Herald Published: 23-Sep-15 | By Allen Myers
![]() |
| Vietnamese vigilantes at the border - Reproduced KI Media |
![]() |
| CNRP MP Real Camerin who led the recent border inspection is feeling the force of the hostility and welcome of Vietnamese village militias - KI Media |
(((
School of Vice:
The ever reliable CPP's dog of war comes out barking in defense of its
payroll master as usual? It would certainly appear that the only error
in judgement made by the previous Rapporteur was to cave in to this kind
of cheap and dirty smear campaign waged against the democratic
opposition by the ruling party. Never mind that most of the instances of
irregularities before, during and after the last general election had
emanated from the ruling camp. These instances include
distorting/manipulating voter register at various demographic regions,
making up "ghost voters", bribing villagers to vote for the ruling party
[by means of its total monopoly over national assets and resources],
multiple voting, blocking campaigning opposition MPs and activists off
public venues like markets; and most odious of all, using its controlled
election
tool - NEC - to fashion election result and outcome to the whims of its
master and to the betrayal of the Cambodian voters. Needless to mention,
the subsequent call for an investigation into all these allegations of
irregularities by civil society groups, relevant election monitors and
the main opposition party along with the call for a vote recount had
largely fallen on deaf ears.
As
for physically blocking Vietnamese "voters" by "gangs of CNRP
supporters", why should such people who have been flocking into the
country illegally by the hundreds of thousands over the last 30 years
through the open-door generosity and blind submission to Hanoi's demand
on the part of its proxy regime in Phnom Penh, be allowed to distort the
authentic democratic will of the Cambodian people and voters? Just
imagine, if you will, the reverse taking place across the border any
where in Vietnam - more likely than not gangs of Vietnamese militia in
plain clothes would have come out in force with large sticks bearing
rusty nails to violently clamp down on the impostors and "extremists"?
Remember the last border inspection incident? Well, that was reputedly
taking place on Cambodian soil!
)))
After the CNRP made hostility to “yuon” central in its 2013 election campaign, gangs of CNRP supporters used physical violence to block voters they considered “yuon” on election day ...
Professor
Rhona Smith, the new United Nations special rapporteur on human rights
in Cambodia, is on her first visit to Phnom Penh in that capacity (she
has been here before as a visiting professor at Pannasastra University).
According
to a government spokesperson, in her meeting with Prime Minister Hun
Sen, Professor Smith said that “she will work with the government to
promote the protection of human rights without violating the sovereignty
and integrity” of Cambodia.
I
know nothing about Professor Smith and so cannot make any predictions
about how she will perform her role. But if she follows the words just
quoted, she will be a vast improvement on her predecessor, Professor
Surya Subedi.
I
am confident that Subedi never said publicly that he saw his role as
infringing on Cambodian sovereignty. However, that lack of warning
didn’t restrain his behaviour.
In
2012, a year before the elections to the National Assembly, Subedi
produced a “report” on Cambodian electoral procedures that called for
changes to any number of laws and procedures, including those on the
NEC, voter registration, media regulation and even judicial structures
(he wanted the creation of a special electoral court).
Fortunately,
after the opposition Sam Rainsy Party and Human Rights Party had used
it in their campaign to discredit the 2013 elections before they
occurred, Subedi’s report was soon forgotten, as it richly deserved:
most of its recommendations were unnecessary, counterproductive and/or
mutually contradictory. (For my critique at the time, see
http://letters2pppapers.wordpress.com/archives/2012-2/subedis-proposals-wont-improve-cambodian-elections/.)
More
recently, in November, Subedi issued a press release on “judicial
independence” that was predictably recirculated by Radio Free Asia and
similar outlets. On examination, this revealed that Subedi was simply
repeating nice-sounding words in an effort to make Cambodian courts rule
the way that people like Surya Subedi thought they should. (See my
comments at
https://letters2pppapers.wordpress.com/archives/2014-2/another-illogical-cure-from-surya-subedi/.)
Subedi’s
procedure was simply to mouth empty platitudes (“democratic
institutions” should be “effective”) without giving much, or any,
thought to what those concepts might mean in Cambodia, now. This played
into the hands of opposition politicians and the NGOs who support them,
many of which are experienced at using the rhetoric of democracy, if not
the practice, to pressure the government.
One hopes that Professor Smith will show more ability to deal with reality rather than empty phrases.
According
to press reports, in their meeting, Hun Sen suggested to Smith that she
ought to look at the matter of racism – a reference to the Cambodian
National Rescue Party’s attacks on ethnic Vietnamese living in Cambodia.
After
the CNRP made hostility to “yuon” central in its 2013 election
campaign, gangs of CNRP supporters used physical violence to block
voters they considered “yuon” on election day (see some examples at
https://letters2pppapers.wordpress.com/archives/2014-2/how-the-era-covers-for-violence-and-racism/).
If
Subedi noticed those incidents, he didn’t say much if anything about
them. However, in January 2014, seven months after a government
spokesperson had publicly complained that Subedi’s statements never
criticised opposition racism, and after CNRP demonstrators had looted
and destroyed shops that they thought were owned by “yuon”, Subedi
managed to tell a press conference that he was “alarmed by the
anti-Vietnamese language allegedly used in public by the opposition”
(Phnom Penh Post, January 17, 2014).
Did
you get that? There was “anti-Vietnamese language allegedly used” by
the CNRP leaders. Maybe they hadn’t said that Vietnamese were
responsible for nearly everything that’s wrong in Cambodia or that the
government is a “Vietnamese puppet” – it seems the United Nations budget
didn’t extend to having researchers find out whether CNRP had really
said such things.
Then
Subedi in the same press conference went on to explain that the CNRP
leaders had assured him that they were working for “tolerance and racial
harmony” – not alleged tolerance and harmony. And: “Whatever measures
other people inferred from their statements, it was not their [CNRP
leaders’] intention” that they should go and do the things they did. Of
course not: when the CNRP leaders said that hordes of Vietnamese were
being brought into the country to vote for the government and that CNRP
supporters should remain at polling stations all day after they had
voted, they didn’t intend that those supporters should actually do
anything. Of course not.
This
history is important. Why? Because racism, if it’s not challenged
whenever it raises its ugly head, doesn’t go away; it grows and festers.
Europeans who in the 17th century thought that it was acceptable to
enslave Africans helped to create tragedies that are still being played
out in the United States and many other places today. Germans who in the
1920s said things like “Hitler shouldn’t exaggerate, but his criticisms
of the Jews have a point” contributed to the Holocaust.
The
record shows that Surya Subedi did his best to avoid confronting, or
even recognising, anti-Vietnamese racism being encouraged for political
reasons.
If
an ordinary Cambodian or a visitor avoids that, the impact is not very
great: usually, only a large number of individuals doing or not doing
something make a noticeable difference. But the UN special rapporteur
has an aura of being the judge on behalf of the “international
community” of the standing of human rights in Cambodia. He or she can
therefore help to shape the behaviour of larger numbers.
If
such an authority devotes his/her time and effort to trying to
rearrange the procedures for settling electoral disputes but has little
or nothing to say when people are prevented from voting because of their
perceived ethnicity, that tells Cambodians that technical fixes of
electoral or judicial procedures are more important than the treatment
of minorities. That idea is a lie.
That
is why I think that Surya Subedi’s role undermined human rights in
Cambodia rather than advancing them. Let’s hope that Rhona Smith will
not repeat Subedi’s mistakes.


No comments:
Post a Comment